Congressional earmarks in IL
Projects Congress paid for by name in the annual spending laws: House Community Project Funding and Senate Congressionally Directed Spending, FY2022–FY2024. 4 provisions worth $52.90M match.
By year
- FY2022 $52.90M · 4
FY2025: none (a full-year continuing resolution). FY2026: enacted, not yet in GAO's data.
Requesting members
- Richard J. Durbin Sen. IL · $52.90M · 4
- Sam Graves Rep. MO · $45.10M · 1
- Tammy Duckworth Sen. IL · $45.10M · 1
- Cheri Bustos Rep. IL · $45.10M · 1
- Roy Blunt Sen. MO · $45.10M · 1
- Blaine Luetkemeyer Rep. MO · $45.10M · 1
- Tammy Baldwin Sen. WI · $45.10M · 1
- Ashley Hinson Rep. IA · $45.10M · 1
A project with several requesters counts for each of them.
By agency
- Army Corps of Engineers $52.90M · 4
Largest provisions
| FY | Project and recipient | Agency | Requested by | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Upper Mississippi River - Illinois WW System, IL, IA, MN, MO & WI U.S. Army Corps of Engineers · IL, IA, MN, MO & WI | Army Corps of Engineers · Construction | Senator Tammy Baldwin WI, Senator Roy Blunt MO, Senator Tammy Duckworth IL, Senator Richard Durbin IL, Representative Cheri Bustos IL, Representative Samuel Graves MO, Representative Ashley Hinson IA, Representative Blaine Luetkemeyer MO | $45.10M $45.00M obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2022 | Madison and St. Clair Counties, IL U.S. Army Corps of Engineers · IL | Army Corps of Engineers · Construction | Senator Richard Durbin IL | $6.03M $57.1K obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2022 | Upper Des Plaines River Flooding and Restoration, IL U.S. Army Corps of Engineers · IL | Army Corps of Engineers · Investigations | Senator Richard Durbin IL | $1.52M $66.5K obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2022 | IL River 519 Fox River Dams Restoration, IL U.S. Army Corps of Engineers · IL | Army Corps of Engineers · Investigations | Senator Richard Durbin IL | $250.0K $114.8K obligated by 9/30/23 |
Enacted earmarks from GAO's Tracking the Funds data (FY2022-FY2024). FY2025 had none (a full-year continuing resolution); FY2026's are enacted but not yet in GAO's data. Amounts are what the law provided, not what was spent. Source: GAO, Tracking the Funds. Requesters are matched to today's members of Congress by name and state; former members show as GAO wrote them.