Earmarks requested by Mark Kelly
Projects Congress paid for by name in the annual spending laws: House Community Project Funding and Senate Congressionally Directed Spending, FY2022–FY2024. 5 provisions worth $6.60M match.
Senator Mark Kelly (Democrat, AZ) · official site ↗
By year
- FY2023 $6.60M · 5
FY2025: none (a full-year continuing resolution). FY2026: enacted, not yet in GAO's data.
Requesting members
- Mark Kelly Sen. AZ · $6.60M · 5
- Kyrsten Sinema Sen. AZ · $6.60M · 5
- Ann Kirkpatrick Rep. AZ · $1.67M · 1
- Thomas O'halleran Rep. AZ · $750.0K · 1
A project with several requesters counts for each of them.
By agency
- Department of Agriculture $6.60M · 5
Largest provisions
| FY | Project and recipient | Agency | Requested by | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Tubac Fire District Fire Station Tubac Fire District · AZ | Department of Agriculture · Rural Housing Service | Senator Mark Kelly AZ, Senator Kyrsten Sinema AZ | $2.00M |
| 2023 | Mt Lemmon Fire District Fire Station Remodel and Expansion Mt. Lemmon Fire District · AZ | Department of Agriculture · Rural Housing Service | Senator Mark Kelly AZ, Senator Kyrsten Sinema AZ, Representative Ann Kirkpatrick AZ | $1.67M |
| 2023 | U.S. Arid Land Agricultural Research Center U.S. Arid Land Agricultural Research Center · AZ | Department of Agriculture · Agricultural Research Service | Senator Mark Kelly AZ, Senator Kyrsten Sinema AZ | $1.48M |
| 2023 | Michaelson Building Incubator Workforce Development Project City of Globe · AZ | Department of Agriculture · Rural Housing Service | Senator Mark Kelly AZ, Senator Kyrsten Sinema AZ, Representative Thomas O'halleran AZ | $750.0K |
| 2023 | Agricultural Research Service Facility Upgrades Agricultural Research Service - Tucson · AZ | Department of Agriculture · Agricultural Research Service | Senator Mark Kelly AZ, Senator Kyrsten Sinema AZ | $698.0K $57.7K obligated by 9/30/23 |
Enacted earmarks from GAO's Tracking the Funds data (FY2022-FY2024). FY2025 had none (a full-year continuing resolution); FY2026's are enacted but not yet in GAO's data. Amounts are what the law provided, not what was spent. Source: GAO, Tracking the Funds. Requesters are matched to today's members of Congress by name and state; former members show as GAO wrote them.