Congressional earmarks in NC
Projects Congress paid for by name in the annual spending laws: House Community Project Funding and Senate Congressionally Directed Spending, FY2022–FY2024. 6 provisions worth $112.20M match.
By year
- FY2022 $112.20M · 6
FY2025: none (a full-year continuing resolution). FY2026: enacted, not yet in GAO's data.
Requesting members
- Richard Burr Sen. NC · $92.20M · 3
- Thom Tillis Sen. NC · $25.30M · 3
- David Price Rep. NC · $4.00M · 1
A project with several requesters counts for each of them.
By agency
- Department of Defense $112.20M · 6
Largest provisions
| FY | Project and recipient | Agency | Requested by | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Water Treatment Plant Replacement Hadnot Point: Cost to Complete · NC | Department of Defense · Military Construction, Navy | Senator Richard Burr NC | $64.20M $64.20M obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2022 | ATC Tower and Airfield Operations · NC | Department of Defense · Military Construction, Navy | Senator Richard Burr NC | $18.70M $18.70M obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2022 | Maintenance Hangar: Planning and Design · NC | Department of Defense · Military Construction, Navy | Senator Thomas Tillis NC | $13.30M $7.49M obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2022 | F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Sustainment Center: Planning and Design · NC | Department of Defense · Military Construction, Navy | Senator Richard Burr NC, Senator Thomas Tillis NC | $9.30M $9.30M obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2022 | Assessing and Tracking Tactical Forces Initiative The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC · NC | Department of Defense · RDTE,DW | Representative David Price NC | $4.00M $3.85M obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2022 | Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Addition/Alteration: Planning and Design · NC | Department of Defense · Military Construction, Army National Guard | Senator Thomas Tillis NC | $2.70M $86.8K obligated by 9/30/23 |
Enacted earmarks from GAO's Tracking the Funds data (FY2022-FY2024). FY2025 had none (a full-year continuing resolution); FY2026's are enacted but not yet in GAO's data. Amounts are what the law provided, not what was spent. Source: GAO, Tracking the Funds. Requesters are matched to today's members of Congress by name and state; former members show as GAO wrote them.