Congressional earmarks in UT

Projects Congress paid for by name in the annual spending laws: House Community Project Funding and Senate Congressionally Directed Spending, FY2022–FY2024. 4 provisions worth $5.57M match.

Clear

By year

FY2025: none (a full-year continuing resolution). FY2026: enacted, not yet in GAO's data.

Requesting members

  • Chris Stewart Rep. UT · $3.00M · 2
  • John Curtis Rep. UT · $2.57M · 2

A project with several requesters counts for each of them.

By agency

Largest provisions

FYProject and recipientAgencyRequested byAmount
2023Beaver City Hydroelectric Plant Transportation Pipeline Replacement Beaver City Corporation, UT · UTDepartment of Energy · Energy ProjectsRepresentative Chris Stewart UT$2.00M
$0 obligated by 9/30/23
2023Advanced Energy Research Equipment Emery County, UT, San Rafael Energy Research Center · UTDepartment of Energy · Energy ProjectsRepresentative John Curtis UT$1.49M
$0 obligated by 9/30/23
2023Hydrogen Electrolyzer Performance Research Emery County, UT, San Rafael Energy Research Center · UTDepartment of Energy · Energy ProjectsRepresentative John Curtis UT$1.08M
$0 obligated by 9/30/23
2023Millcreek Battery Project City of Saint George, UT, Utility Department · UTDepartment of Energy · Energy ProjectsRepresentative Chris Stewart UT$1.00M
$0 obligated by 9/30/23

Enacted earmarks from GAO's Tracking the Funds data (FY2022-FY2024). FY2025 had none (a full-year continuing resolution); FY2026's are enacted but not yet in GAO's data. Amounts are what the law provided, not what was spent. Source: GAO, Tracking the Funds. Requesters are matched to today's members of Congress by name and state; former members show as GAO wrote them.