Earmarks requested by J. Luis Correa
Projects Congress paid for by name in the annual spending laws: House Community Project Funding and Senate Congressionally Directed Spending, FY2022–FY2024. 4 provisions worth $7.50M match.
Representative J. Luis Correa (Democrat, CA-46) · official site ↗
By year
- FY2023 $7.50M · 4
FY2025: none (a full-year continuing resolution). FY2026: enacted, not yet in GAO's data.
Requesting members
- J. Luis Correa Rep. CA · $7.50M · 4
- Dianne Feinstein Sen. CA · $4.50M · 2
- Young Kim Rep. CA · $2.00M · 1
- Alex Padilla Sen. CA · $1.50M · 1
A project with several requesters counts for each of them.
By agency
- Department of Health and Human Services $7.50M · 4
Largest provisions
| FY | Project and recipient | Agency | Requested by | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | County of Orange, Santa Ana, CA for facilities and equipment · CA | Department of Health and Human Services · Health Resources and Services Administration | Senator Dianne Feinstein CA, Representative Jose Correa CA | $3.00M $3.00M obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2023 | Orange County Health Authority (dba CalOptima), Orange, CA for equipment · CA | Department of Health and Human Services · Health Resources and Services Administration | Representative Jose Correa CA, Representative Young Kim CA | $2.00M $2.00M obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2023 | Children's Hospital of Orange County, CA, for facilities and equipment · CA | Department of Health and Human Services · Health Resources and Services Administration | Senator Alejandro Padilla CA, Senator Dianne Feinstein CA, Representative Jose Correa CA | $1.50M $1.50M obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2023 | Anaheim Community Foundation, Anaheim, CA for mental health and related support services · CA | Department of Health and Human Services · Substance Use and Mental Health Services Administration | Representative Jose Correa CA | $1.00M $1.00M obligated by 9/30/23 |
Enacted earmarks from GAO's Tracking the Funds data (FY2022-FY2024). FY2025 had none (a full-year continuing resolution); FY2026's are enacted but not yet in GAO's data. Amounts are what the law provided, not what was spent. Source: GAO, Tracking the Funds. Requesters are matched to today's members of Congress by name and state; former members show as GAO wrote them.