Congressional earmarks in UT

Projects Congress paid for by name in the annual spending laws: House Community Project Funding and Senate Congressionally Directed Spending, FY2022–FY2024. 4 provisions worth $8.02M match.

Clear

By year

FY2025: none (a full-year continuing resolution). FY2026: enacted, not yet in GAO's data.

Requesting members

  • Chris Stewart Rep. UT · $6.00M · 2
  • Blake D. Moore Rep. UT · $1.50M · 1
  • John Curtis Rep. UT · $515.0K · 1

A project with several requesters counts for each of them.

Largest provisions

FYProject and recipientAgencyRequested byAmount
2023University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT for facilities and equipment · UTDepartment of Health and Human Services · Health Resources and Services AdministrationRepresentative Chris Stewart UT$3.00M
$3.00M obligated by 9/30/23
2023ARUP Laboratories, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT for facilities · UTDepartment of Health and Human Services · Health Resources and Services AdministrationRepresentative Chris Stewart UT$3.00M
$3.00M obligated by 9/30/23
2023Weber State University, Ogden, UT for facilities and equipment · UTDepartment of Health and Human Services · Health Resources and Services AdministrationRepresentative Blake Moore UT$1.50M
$1.50M obligated by 9/30/23
2023San Juan County, Monticello, UT for cancer screening · UTDepartment of Health and Human Services · Health Resources and Services AdministrationRepresentative John Curtis UT$515.0K
$515.0K obligated by 9/30/23

Enacted earmarks from GAO's Tracking the Funds data (FY2022-FY2024). FY2025 had none (a full-year continuing resolution); FY2026's are enacted but not yet in GAO's data. Amounts are what the law provided, not what was spent. Source: GAO, Tracking the Funds. Requesters are matched to today's members of Congress by name and state; former members show as GAO wrote them.