Earmarks requested by James E. Clyburn

Projects Congress paid for by name in the annual spending laws: House Community Project Funding and Senate Congressionally Directed Spending, FY2022–FY2024. 6 provisions worth $15.00M match.

Representative James E. Clyburn (Democrat, SC-06) · official site ↗

Clear

By year

FY2025: none (a full-year continuing resolution). FY2026: enacted, not yet in GAO's data.

Requesting members

A project with several requesters counts for each of them.

Largest provisions

FYProject and recipientAgencyRequested byAmount
2023South Carolina State University ROTC Multipurpose Complex (MPC) South Carolina State University · SCDepartment of Housing and Urban Development · Community Development FundRepresentative James Clyburn SC$4.00M
$4.00M obligated by 9/30/23
2023Benedict College Music Academic Complex Benedict College · SCDepartment of Housing and Urban Development · Community Development FundRepresentative James Clyburn SC$3.00M
$3.00M obligated by 9/30/23
2023Hampton County Recreation Complex Hampton County · SCDepartment of Housing and Urban Development · Community Development FundRepresentative James Clyburn SC$3.00M
$3.00M obligated by 9/30/23
2023Haven at Palmer Pointe Housing Authority of the City of Columbia, SC · SCDepartment of Housing and Urban Development · Community Development FundRepresentative James Clyburn SC$3.00M
$3.00M obligated by 9/30/23
2023University of South Carolina Center for Civil Rights History and Research University of South Carolina · SCDepartment of Housing and Urban Development · Community Development FundRepresentative James Clyburn SC$1.50M
$1.50M obligated by 9/30/23
2023The Second Chance Project Community Foundation of the Lowcountry, Inc · SCDepartment of Housing and Urban Development · Community Development FundRepresentative James Clyburn SC$500.0K
$500.0K obligated by 9/30/23

Enacted earmarks from GAO's Tracking the Funds data (FY2022-FY2024). FY2025 had none (a full-year continuing resolution); FY2026's are enacted but not yet in GAO's data. Amounts are what the law provided, not what was spent. Source: GAO, Tracking the Funds. Requesters are matched to today's members of Congress by name and state; former members show as GAO wrote them.