Earmarks requested by Haley M. Stevens
Projects Congress paid for by name in the annual spending laws: House Community Project Funding and Senate Congressionally Directed Spending, FY2022–FY2024. 5 provisions worth $7.62M match.
Representative Haley M. Stevens (Democrat, MI-11) · official site ↗
By year
- FY2023 $7.62M · 5
FY2025: none (a full-year continuing resolution). FY2026: enacted, not yet in GAO's data.
Requesting members
- Haley M. Stevens Rep. MI · $7.62M · 5
- Deborah Stabenow Sen. MI · $2.27M · 1
A project with several requesters counts for each of them.
By agency
- Department of Housing and Urban Development $7.62M · 5
Largest provisions
| FY | Project and recipient | Agency | Requested by | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Oakland County Farmer's Market Modernization & Improvement Project County of Oakland · MI | Department of Housing and Urban Development · Community Development Fund | Senator Deborah Stabenow MI, Representative Haley Stevens MI | $2.27M $2.27M obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2023 | Shiawassee Connection City of Farmington · MI | Department of Housing and Urban Development · Community Development Fund | Representative Haley Stevens MI | $2.10M $2.10M obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2023 | City of Troy - Sylvan Glen Lake Park City of Troy, MI · MI | Department of Housing and Urban Development · Community Development Fund | Representative Haley Stevens MI | $1.50M $1.50M obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2023 | Ridge Road Park Phase 1 Design and Engineering Charter Township of Canton · MI | Department of Housing and Urban Development · Community Development Fund | Representative Haley Stevens MI | $1.00M $1.00M obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2023 | Waterford Downtown Revitalization Project Charter Township of Waterford · MI | Department of Housing and Urban Development · Community Development Fund | Representative Haley Stevens MI | $750.0K $750.0K obligated by 9/30/23 |
Enacted earmarks from GAO's Tracking the Funds data (FY2022-FY2024). FY2025 had none (a full-year continuing resolution); FY2026's are enacted but not yet in GAO's data. Amounts are what the law provided, not what was spent. Source: GAO, Tracking the Funds. Requesters are matched to today's members of Congress by name and state; former members show as GAO wrote them.