Congressional earmarks in KS

Projects Congress paid for by name in the annual spending laws: House Community Project Funding and Senate Congressionally Directed Spending, FY2022–FY2024. 6 provisions worth $24.75M match.

Clear

By year

FY2025: none (a full-year continuing resolution). FY2026: enacted, not yet in GAO's data.

Requesting members

A project with several requesters counts for each of them.

Largest provisions

FYProject and recipientAgencyRequested byAmount
2023Paving the Way to a Sustainable Future: The City of Russell's Transportation Reconstruction Plan City of Russell · KSDepartment of Housing and Urban Development · Community Development FundSenator Jerry Moran KS$13.50M
$13.50M obligated by 9/30/23
2023Manufacturing Re-shoring Initiative and Prove Out Facility for the National Institute of Materials Advancement Pittsburg State University · KSDepartment of Housing and Urban Development · Community Development FundRepresentative Jake LaTurner KS$4.00M
$4.00M obligated by 9/30/23
2023Gardner Wastewater Infrastructure Project City of Gardner · KSDepartment of Housing and Urban Development · Community Development FundRepresentative Sharice Davids KS$3.00M
$3.00M obligated by 9/30/23
2023The Timbers Housing Renovation Project Cerebral Palsy Research Foundation of Kansas · KSDepartment of Housing and Urban Development · Community Development FundSenator Jerry Moran KS$2.50M
$2.50M obligated by 9/30/23
2023Unified Government Park Infrastructure Improvements Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, Kansas · KSDepartment of Housing and Urban Development · Community Development FundRepresentative Sharice Davids KS$1.00M
$1.00M obligated by 9/30/23
2023Cedar Lake Dam Restoration City of Olathe, Kansas · KSDepartment of Housing and Urban Development · Community Development FundRepresentative Sharice Davids KS$750.0K
$750.0K obligated by 9/30/23

Enacted earmarks from GAO's Tracking the Funds data (FY2022-FY2024). FY2025 had none (a full-year continuing resolution); FY2026's are enacted but not yet in GAO's data. Amounts are what the law provided, not what was spent. Source: GAO, Tracking the Funds. Requesters are matched to today's members of Congress by name and state; former members show as GAO wrote them.