Earmarks requested by Mark DeSaulnier
Projects Congress paid for by name in the annual spending laws: House Community Project Funding and Senate Congressionally Directed Spending, FY2022–FY2024. 6 provisions worth $3.83M match.
Representative Mark DeSaulnier (Democrat, CA-10) · official site ↗
By year
FY2025: none (a full-year continuing resolution). FY2026: enacted, not yet in GAO's data.
Requesting members
- Mark DeSaulnier Rep. CA · $3.83M · 6
- Jerry McNerney Rep. CA · $1.18M · 1
A project with several requesters counts for each of them.
By agency
- Department of Justice $3.83M · 6
Largest provisions
| FY | Project and recipient | Agency | Requested by | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Strategies for Supporting Youth in the Community Contra Costa County, Probation Department, Office of Reentry & Justice · CA | Department of Justice · OJP-Byrne | Representative Mark Desaulnier CA, Representative Jerry McNerney CA | $1.18M $1.18M obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2024 | Public Safety Radio Replacement Project City of Walnut Creek · CA | Department of Justice · COPS Tech | Representative Mark Desaulnier CA | $963.0K |
| 2024 | Antioch Gunshot Detection Technology Project Antioch Police Department · CA | Department of Justice · COPS Tech | Representative Mark Desaulnier CA | $740.0K |
| 2024 | Contra Costa Commercial and Sexual Exploitation of Children Navigators Capacity Building Initiative Seneca Family of Agencies · CA | Department of Justice · OJP–Byrne | Representative Mark Desaulnier CA | $450.0K |
| 2023 | Office of Neighborhood Safety Community Violence Intervention Programs Project City of Richmond, Office of Neighborhood Safety · CA | Department of Justice · OJP-Byrne | Representative Mark Desaulnier CA | $300.0K $300.0K obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2024 | Situational Awareness Cameras Project City of Dublin · CA | Department of Justice · COPS Tech | Representative Mark Desaulnier CA | $198.0K |
Enacted earmarks from GAO's Tracking the Funds data (FY2022-FY2024). FY2025 had none (a full-year continuing resolution); FY2026's are enacted but not yet in GAO's data. Amounts are what the law provided, not what was spent. Source: GAO, Tracking the Funds. Requesters are matched to today's members of Congress by name and state; former members show as GAO wrote them.