Congressional earmarks in UT

Projects Congress paid for by name in the annual spending laws: House Community Project Funding and Senate Congressionally Directed Spending, FY2022–FY2024. 4 provisions worth $13.00M match.

Clear

By year

FY2025: none (a full-year continuing resolution). FY2026: enacted, not yet in GAO's data.

Requesting members

  • Chris Stewart Rep. UT · $7.00M · 2
  • Blake D. Moore Rep. UT · $6.00M · 2

A project with several requesters counts for each of them.

By agency

Largest provisions

FYProject and recipientAgencyRequested byAmount
2022Ephraim Road Safety & Economic Development Project · UTDepartment of Transportation · Highway Infrastructure ProgramsRepresentative Chris Stewart UT$4.00M
$466.1K obligated by 9/30/23
2022Industrial Road Improvements · UTDepartment of Transportation · Highway Infrastructure ProgramsRepresentative Chris Stewart UT$3.00M
$279.7K obligated by 9/30/23
2022Cache Valley Transit District - Bus Request and Tracking App Cache Valley Transit District · UTDepartment of Transportation · Transit Infrastructure GrantsRepresentative Blake Moore UT$3.00M
$2.79M obligated by 9/30/23
2022Utah Military Installation Development Authority - 3-Gate Trail site acquisition and construction · UTDepartment of Transportation · Highway Infrastructure ProgramsRepresentative Blake Moore UT$3.00M
$0 obligated by 9/30/23

Enacted earmarks from GAO's Tracking the Funds data (FY2022-FY2024). FY2025 had none (a full-year continuing resolution); FY2026's are enacted but not yet in GAO's data. Amounts are what the law provided, not what was spent. Source: GAO, Tracking the Funds. Requesters are matched to today's members of Congress by name and state; former members show as GAO wrote them.

Congressional earmarks in UT (FY2022–FY2024) · SpendQuery