Earmarks requested by Alex Padilla
Projects Congress paid for by name in the annual spending laws: House Community Project Funding and Senate Congressionally Directed Spending, FY2022–FY2024. 4 provisions worth $19.40M match.
Senator Alex Padilla (Democrat, CA) · official site ↗
By year
- FY2022 $19.40M · 4
FY2025: none (a full-year continuing resolution). FY2026: enacted, not yet in GAO's data.
Requesting members
- Dianne Feinstein Sen. CA · $19.40M · 4
- Alex Padilla Sen. CA · $19.40M · 4
- Grace Napolitano Rep. CA · $10.00M · 1
- Judy Chu Rep. CA · $10.00M · 1
- John Garamendi Rep. CA · $5.00M · 1
- Jim Costa Rep. CA · $500.0K · 1
A project with several requesters counts for each of them.
By agency
- Department of the Interior $19.40M · 4
Largest provisions
| FY | Project and recipient | Agency | Requested by | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | San Gabriel Basin Restoration Fund Bureau of Reclamation · CA | Department of the Interior · Water and Related Resources | Senator Dianne Feinstein CA, Senator Alejandro Padilla CA, Representative Judy Chu CA, Representative Grace Napolitano CA | $10.00M $10.00M obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2022 | Sacramento River Basin Flood Plain Reactivation Bureau of Reclamation · CA | Department of the Interior · Water and Related Resources | Senator Dianne Feinstein CA, Senator Alejandro Padilla CA, Representative John Garamendi CA | $5.00M $4.99M obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2022 | Sacramento River Fish Screen Program Bureau of Reclamation · CA | Department of the Interior · Water and Related Resources | Senator Dianne Feinstein CA, Senator Alejandro Padilla CA | $3.90M $3.85M obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2022 | Los Banos Creek Appraisal Study Bureau of Reclamation · CA | Department of the Interior · Water and Related Resources | Senator Dianne Feinstein CA, Senator Alejandro Padilla CA, Representative Jim Costa CA | $500.0K $0 obligated by 9/30/23 |
Enacted earmarks from GAO's Tracking the Funds data (FY2022-FY2024). FY2025 had none (a full-year continuing resolution); FY2026's are enacted but not yet in GAO's data. Amounts are what the law provided, not what was spent. Source: GAO, Tracking the Funds. Requesters are matched to today's members of Congress by name and state; former members show as GAO wrote them.