Congressional earmarks in UT

Projects Congress paid for by name in the annual spending laws: House Community Project Funding and Senate Congressionally Directed Spending, FY2022–FY2024. 3 provisions worth $8.00M match.

Clear

By year

FY2025: none (a full-year continuing resolution). FY2026: enacted, not yet in GAO's data.

Requesting members

  • Chris Stewart Rep. UT · $4.50M · 2
  • Blake D. Moore Rep. UT · $3.50M · 1

A project with several requesters counts for each of them.

By agency

Largest provisions

FYProject and recipientAgencyRequested byAmount
2022The Town of Manila for a sewage system project · UTEnvironmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants - Clean Water SRFRepresentative Blake Moore UT$3.50M
$0 obligated by 9/30/23
2022The City of Ephraim for a drinking water resiliency project · UTEnvironmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants - Drinking Water SRFRepresentative Chris Stewart UT$3.00M
$0 obligated by 9/30/23
2022The City of Centerville for the Green Steel Tank replacement project · UTEnvironmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants - Drinking Water SRFRepresentative Chris Stewart UT$1.50M
$0 obligated by 9/30/23

Enacted earmarks from GAO's Tracking the Funds data (FY2022-FY2024). FY2025 had none (a full-year continuing resolution); FY2026's are enacted but not yet in GAO's data. Amounts are what the law provided, not what was spent. Source: GAO, Tracking the Funds. Requesters are matched to today's members of Congress by name and state; former members show as GAO wrote them.

Congressional earmarks in UT (FY2022–FY2024) · SpendQuery