Earmarks requested by Cindy Hyde-Smith
Projects Congress paid for by name in the annual spending laws: House Community Project Funding and Senate Congressionally Directed Spending, FY2022–FY2024. 5 provisions worth $22.16M match.
Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith (Republican, MS) · official site ↗
By year
- FY2024 $22.16M · 5
FY2025: none (a full-year continuing resolution). FY2026: enacted, not yet in GAO's data.
Requesting members
- Cindy Hyde-Smith Sen. MS · $22.16M · 5
- Roger F. Wicker Sen. MS · $14.46M · 4
A project with several requesters counts for each of them.
By agency
- Environmental Protection Agency $22.16M · 5
Largest provisions
| FY | Project and recipient | Agency | Requested by | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Cities of Clinton, Bolton, and Raymond for Regional Wastewater Improvements · MS | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants—Clean Water State Revolving Fund | Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith MS | $7.70M |
| 2024 | City of Vicksburg for Drinking Water Improvements · MS | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants—Drinking Water State Revolving Fund | Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith MS, Senator Roger Wicker MS | $6.00M |
| 2024 | Copiah Water Association for Potable Water System Improvements · MS | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants—Drinking Water State Revolving Fund | Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith MS, Senator Roger Wicker MS | $3.77M |
| 2024 | City of Moss Point for Potable Water System Improvements · MS | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants—Drinking Water State Revolving Fund | Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith MS, Senator Roger Wicker MS | $3.60M |
| 2024 | City of Natchez for Stormwater System Replacement · MS | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants—Clean Water State Revolving Fund | Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith MS, Senator Roger Wicker MS | $1.09M |
Enacted earmarks from GAO's Tracking the Funds data (FY2022-FY2024). FY2025 had none (a full-year continuing resolution); FY2026's are enacted but not yet in GAO's data. Amounts are what the law provided, not what was spent. Source: GAO, Tracking the Funds. Requesters are matched to today's members of Congress by name and state; former members show as GAO wrote them.