Earmarks requested by Ed Case
Projects Congress paid for by name in the annual spending laws: House Community Project Funding and Senate Congressionally Directed Spending, FY2022–FY2024. 4 provisions worth $4.60M match.
Representative Ed Case (Democrat, HI-01) · official site ↗
By year
FY2025: none (a full-year continuing resolution). FY2026: enacted, not yet in GAO's data.
Requesting members
- Ed Case Rep. HI · $4.60M · 4
- Brian Schatz Sen. HI · $2.88M · 3
- Mazie K. Hirono Sen. HI · $1.92M · 2
- Jill N. Tokuda Rep. HI · $959.8K · 1
A project with several requesters counts for each of them.
By agency
- Environmental Protection Agency $4.60M · 4
Largest provisions
| FY | Project and recipient | Agency | Requested by | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | State of Hawaii for Pearl Harbor Aquifer Recovery Projects · HI | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants - Clean Water State Revolving Fund | Representative Ed Case HI | $1.72M $0 obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2024 | Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources for Deep Monitoring Wells in Waialae East and Waianae · HI | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants—Drinking Water State Revolving Fund | Senator Brian Schatz HI, Senator Mazie Hirono HI, Representative Ed Case HI, Representative Jill Tokuda HI | $959.8K |
| 2024 | Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources for Water Security Audit and Repairs · HI | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants—Drinking Water State Revolving Fund | Senator Brian Schatz HI, Senator Mazie Hirono HI, Representative Ed Case HI | $959.8K |
| 2024 | Honolulu Board of Water Supply for Kahilinai Place and Aiea Heights Drive Area Water System Improvements · HI | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants—Drinking Water State Revolving Fund | Senator Brian Schatz HI, Representative Ed Case HI | $959.8K |
Enacted earmarks from GAO's Tracking the Funds data (FY2022-FY2024). FY2025 had none (a full-year continuing resolution); FY2026's are enacted but not yet in GAO's data. Amounts are what the law provided, not what was spent. Source: GAO, Tracking the Funds. Requesters are matched to today's members of Congress by name and state; former members show as GAO wrote them.