Earmarks requested by Raul Ruiz
Projects Congress paid for by name in the annual spending laws: House Community Project Funding and Senate Congressionally Directed Spending, FY2022–FY2024. 4 provisions worth $8.60M match.
Representative Raul Ruiz (Democrat, CA-25) · official site ↗
By year
FY2025: none (a full-year continuing resolution). FY2026: enacted, not yet in GAO's data.
Requesting members
- Raul Ruiz Rep. CA · $8.60M · 4
- Alex Padilla Sen. CA · $7.40M · 3
- Dianne Feinstein Sen. CA · $7.40M · 3
A project with several requesters counts for each of them.
By agency
- Environmental Protection Agency $8.60M · 4
Largest provisions
| FY | Project and recipient | Agency | Requested by | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Coachella Valley Water District for a Water Consolidation Project · CA | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants - Drinking Water State Revolving Fund | Senator Alejandro Padilla CA, Senator Dianne Feinstein CA, Representative Raul Ruiz CA | $3.45M $0 obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2022 | Coachella Valley Water District for Water Transmission Project · CA | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants - Drinking Water SRF | Senator Dianne Feinstein CA, Senator Alejandro Padilla CA, Representative Raul Ruiz CA | $2.70M $0 obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2022 | City of Banning for Wastewater Treatment and Groundwater Protection Project · CA | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants - Clean Water SRF | Senator Dianne Feinstein CA, Senator Alejandro Padilla CA, Representative Raul Ruiz CA | $1.25M $0 obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2023 | City of Hemet for the Oakland and Santa Fe Water Main Replacement Project · CA | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants - Drinking Water State Revolving Fund | Representative Raul Ruiz CA | $1.20M $0 obligated by 9/30/23 |
Enacted earmarks from GAO's Tracking the Funds data (FY2022-FY2024). FY2025 had none (a full-year continuing resolution); FY2026's are enacted but not yet in GAO's data. Amounts are what the law provided, not what was spent. Source: GAO, Tracking the Funds. Requesters are matched to today's members of Congress by name and state; former members show as GAO wrote them.