Earmarks requested by Mike Thompson
Projects Congress paid for by name in the annual spending laws: House Community Project Funding and Senate Congressionally Directed Spending, FY2022–FY2024. 5 provisions worth $5.04M match.
Representative Mike Thompson (Democrat, CA-04) · official site ↗
By year
FY2025: none (a full-year continuing resolution). FY2026: enacted, not yet in GAO's data.
Requesting members
- Mike Thompson Rep. CA · $5.04M · 5
A project with several requesters counts for each of them.
By agency
- Environmental Protection Agency $5.04M · 5
Largest provisions
| FY | Project and recipient | Agency | Requested by | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Adventist Health St. Helena Hospital for Napa County Deer Park/St. Helena Water System improvements · CA | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants - Drinking Water SRF | Representative Michael Thompson CA | $1.84M $0 obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2024 | City of Rio Vista for Reclaimed Water System Completion Project (Purple Piping) · CA | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants—Clean Water State Revolving Fund | Representative Michael Thompson CA | $959.8K |
| 2024 | University of California, Davis for In-Lake Water Treatment System at Clear Lake · CA | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants—Clean Water State Revolving Fund | Representative Michael Thompson CA | $959.8K |
| 2024 | City of St. Helena Water for Treatment Plant SCADA/Microgrid · CA | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants—Drinking Water State Revolving Fund | Representative Michael Thompson CA | $959.8K |
| 2022 | County of Lake/Special Districts for Pipeline Design Project · CA | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants - Clean Water SRF | Representative Michael Thompson CA | $320.0K $320.0K obligated by 9/30/23 |
Enacted earmarks from GAO's Tracking the Funds data (FY2022-FY2024). FY2025 had none (a full-year continuing resolution); FY2026's are enacted but not yet in GAO's data. Amounts are what the law provided, not what was spent. Source: GAO, Tracking the Funds. Requesters are matched to today's members of Congress by name and state; former members show as GAO wrote them.