Earmarks requested by Norma J. Torres
Projects Congress paid for by name in the annual spending laws: House Community Project Funding and Senate Congressionally Directed Spending, FY2022–FY2024. 5 provisions worth $7.52M match.
Representative Norma J. Torres (Democrat, CA-35) · official site ↗
By year
FY2025: none (a full-year continuing resolution). FY2026: enacted, not yet in GAO's data.
Requesting members
- Norma J. Torres Rep. CA · $7.52M · 5
A project with several requesters counts for each of them.
By agency
- Environmental Protection Agency $7.52M · 5
Largest provisions
| FY | Project and recipient | Agency | Requested by | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | City of Chino for a Treatment Plant Groundwater Wells 4 & 6 Project · CA | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants - Drinking Water State Revolving Fund | Representative Norma Torres CA | $2.00M $0 obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2022 | West Valley Water District for Bloomington Alleyway Pipeline Project · CA | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants - Drinking Water SRF | Representative Norma Torres CA | $2.00M $0 obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2023 | City of Pomona for Groundwater Treatment R34 · CA | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants - Drinking Water State Revolving Fund | Representative Norma Torres CA | $1.60M $0 obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2024 | Monte Vista Water District for State Street Pipeline Replacement Project (Phase II) · CA | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants—Drinking Water State Revolving Fund | Representative Norma Torres CA | $959.8K |
| 2024 | San Bernardino County for Septic-to-Sewer Conversion Project—Phase 1 · CA | Environmental Protection Agency · State and Tribal Assistance Grants—Clean Water State Revolving Fund | Representative Norma Torres CA | $959.8K |
Enacted earmarks from GAO's Tracking the Funds data (FY2022-FY2024). FY2025 had none (a full-year continuing resolution); FY2026's are enacted but not yet in GAO's data. Amounts are what the law provided, not what was spent. Source: GAO, Tracking the Funds. Requesters are matched to today's members of Congress by name and state; former members show as GAO wrote them.