Earmarks requested by Tammy Baldwin
Projects Congress paid for by name in the annual spending laws: House Community Project Funding and Senate Congressionally Directed Spending, FY2022–FY2024. 2 provisions worth $94.40M match.
Senator Tammy Baldwin (Democrat, WI) · official site ↗
By year
FY2025: none (a full-year continuing resolution). FY2026: enacted, not yet in GAO's data.
Requesting members
- Richard J. Durbin Sen. IL · $94.40M · 2
- Tammy Baldwin Sen. WI · $94.40M · 2
- Cheri Bustos Rep. IL · $94.40M · 2
- Blaine Luetkemeyer Rep. MO · $94.40M · 2
- Sam Graves Rep. MO · $94.40M · 2
- Roy Blunt Sen. MO · $94.40M · 2
- Tammy Duckworth Sen. IL · $94.40M · 2
- Darin LaHood Rep. IL · $49.30M · 1
- Tina Smith Sen. MN · $49.30M · 1
- Amy Klobuchar Sen. MN · $49.30M · 1
A project with several requesters counts for each of them.
By agency
- Army Corps of Engineers $94.40M · 2
Largest provisions
| FY | Project and recipient | Agency | Requested by | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Upper Mississippi River - Illinois WW System, IL, IA, MN, MO & WI U.S. Army Corps of Engineers · IL, MN, MO, WI | Army Corps of Engineers · Construction | Senator Tina Smith MN, Senator Tammy Duckworth IL, Senator Amy Klobuchar MN, Senator Richard Durbin IL, Senator Roy Blunt MO, Senator Tammy Baldwin WI, Representative Samuel Graves MO, Representative Blaine Luetkemeyer MO, Representative Cheri Bustos IL, Representative Darin Lahood IL | $49.30M $36.50M obligated by 9/30/23 |
| 2022 | Upper Mississippi River - Illinois WW System, IL, IA, MN, MO & WI U.S. Army Corps of Engineers · IL, IA, MN, MO & WI | Army Corps of Engineers · Construction | Senator Tammy Baldwin WI, Senator Roy Blunt MO, Senator Tammy Duckworth IL, Senator Richard Durbin IL, Representative Cheri Bustos IL, Representative Samuel Graves MO, Representative Ashley Hinson IA, Representative Blaine Luetkemeyer MO | $45.10M $45.00M obligated by 9/30/23 |
Enacted earmarks from GAO's Tracking the Funds data (FY2022-FY2024). FY2025 had none (a full-year continuing resolution); FY2026's are enacted but not yet in GAO's data. Amounts are what the law provided, not what was spent. Source: GAO, Tracking the Funds. Requesters are matched to today's members of Congress by name and state; former members show as GAO wrote them.