FAR and DFARS › FAR Part 15: Contracting by Negotiation › Subpart 15.6
FAR 15.606-2 Evaluation.
The codified text (eCFR, as of 2026-10-02). Under the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul ↗, agencies follow class deviations with new text for many parts while the formal rules go through the Federal Register: check the solicitation and your contract's clauses, which rule.
In plain English
This section describes how agencies evaluate unsolicited proposals. It requires a comprehensive evaluation coordinated by an agency point of contact, who must mark each proposal with a specific legend. Evaluators must consider factors such as innovation, scientific merit, mission relevance, offeror capabilities, key personnel qualifications, and cost realism.
Applies to: Agencies evaluating unsolicited proposals
What it requires
- Coordinate comprehensive evaluations through the agency contact point
- Attach or imprint the required legend on each unsolicited proposal circulated for evaluation
- Consider the listed factors when performing a comprehensive evaluation
- Notify the agency point of contact of recommendations when evaluation is completed
Key terms: unsolicited proposal · comprehensive evaluation · agency contact point · legend · offeror
Written by AI from this section's text. A guide, not legal advice: the text below rules.
The text
(a) Comprehensive evaluations shall be coordinated by the agency contact point, who shall attach or imprint on each unsolicited proposal, circulated for evaluation, the legend required by 15.609(d). When performing a comprehensive evaluation of an unsolicited proposal, evaluators shall consider the following factors, in addition to any others appropriate for the particular proposal:
(1) Unique, innovative and meritorious methods, approaches, or concepts demonstrated by the proposal;
(2) Overall scientific, technical, or socioeconomic merits of the proposal;
(3) Potential contribution of the effort to the agency's specific mission;
(4) The offeror's capabilities, related experience, facilities, techniques, or unique combinations of these that are integral factors for achieving the proposal objectives;
(5) The qualifications, capabilities, and experience of the proposed principal investigator, team leader, or key personnel critical to achieving the proposal objectives; and
(6) The realism of the proposed cost.
(b) The evaluators shall notify the agency point of contact of their recommendations when the evaluation is completed.
Sections it refers to
- 15.609 Limited use of data.
← 15.606-1 Receipt and initial review. · 15.607 Criteria for acceptance and negotiation of an unsolicited proposal. →
Rule changes for FAR Part 15
- Federal Acquisition Regulation: Revolutionary FAR Overhaul Parts 8, 12, 13, 15, 38, 44, and 51 ↗ · proposed 2026-09-18 · comments due 2026-10-19
- Federal Acquisition Regulation: Inflation Adjustment of Acquisition-Related Thresholds ↗ · final rule 2025-08-27 · effective 2025-10-01
- Federal Acquisition Regulation: Preventing Organizational Conflicts of Interest in Federal Acquisition ↗ · proposed 2025-01-15 · comments due 2025-03-17
- Federal Acquisition Regulation: Controlled Unclassified Information ↗ · proposed 2025-01-15 · comments due 2025-03-17
- Federal Acquisition Regulation: Inflation Adjustment of Acquisition-Related Thresholds ↗ · proposed 2024-11-29 · comments due 2025-01-28
- Federal Acquisition Regulation: Reverse Auction Guidance ↗ · final rule 2024-07-30 · effective 2024-08-29
- Federal Acquisition Regulation: Sustainable Procurement ↗ · final rule 2024-04-22 · effective 2024-05-22
Source: eCFR, 48 CFR chapters 1 and 2 (GPO GovInfo bulk data) ↗. Plain words for the terms: glossary.