FAR and DFARS › DFARS Part 215: Contracting by Negotiation › Subpart 215.1

DFARS 215.101-71 Tradeoff process when acquiring fuel for overseas contingency operations.

The codified text (eCFR, as of 2026-10-02). Under the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul ↗, agencies follow class deviations with new text for many parts while the formal rules go through the Federal Register: check the solicitation and your contract's clauses, which rule.

In plain English

This section tells contracting officers how to approach source selection when buying fuel for an overseas contingency operation above the simplified acquisition threshold. It directs them to consider using a tradeoff process and lists evaluation factors they should consider. If a tradeoff process was not considered, the contracting officer must justify that in writing and get approval from an official one level above.

Applies to: Contracting officers acquiring fuel for overseas contingency operations expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold

What it requires

  • Consider using a tradeoff process in accordance with FAR 15.101-1
  • If a tradeoff process was not considered, justify in writing why it was not considered before issuing the solicitation
  • Obtain approval from an official one level above the contracting officer (this authority is not delegable)
  • Include the justification in the contract file

Key terms: tradeoff process · overseas contingency operation · simplified acquisition threshold · contracting officer · solicitation

Written by AI from this section's text. A guide, not legal advice: the text below rules.

The text

(a) When conducting a source selection for the acquisition of fuel that is for an overseas contingency operation and is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, the contracting officer shall consider using a tradeoff process in accordance with FAR 15.101-1 (section 843 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (Pub. L. 117-81)). The contracting officer should consider using the following evaluation factors in any such tradeoff process:

(1) Past performance.

(2) Cost.

(3) Anticorruption training.

(4) Anticorruption compliance.

(b) If a tradeoff process was not considered, prior to the issuance of the solicitation, the contracting officer shall justify in writing why a tradeoff process was not considered and obtain approval by an official one level above the contracting officer. This authority is not delegable. The contracting officer shall include the justification in the contract file.

Sections it refers to

Sections that refer to it

← 215.101-70 Best value when acquiring tents or other temporary structures. · 215.203-70 Requests for proposals—tiered evaluation of offers. →

Rule changes for DFARS Part 215

Source: eCFR, 48 CFR chapters 1 and 2 (GPO GovInfo bulk data) ↗. Plain words for the terms: glossary.

DFARS 215.101-71 Tradeoff process when acquiring fuel for overseas contingency operations · SpendQuery