FAR and DFARS › DFARS Part 217: Special Contracting Methods › Subpart 217.75
DFARS 217.7505 Limitations on price increases.
The codified text (eCFR, as of 2026-10-02). Under the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul ↗, agencies follow class deviations with new text for many parts while the formal rules go through the Federal Register: check the solicitation and your contract's clauses, which rule.
In plain English
This section limits sole-source awards for centrally managed replenishment parts when the price has risen 25 percent or more over the most recent 12-month period. It also lets the contracting officer award anyway if a written certification of fair and reasonable pricing or national security need is made before award. It matters because it restricts when a contractor can receive a sole-source award after a significant price increase.
Applies to: Contracting officers awarding sole-source contracts for centrally managed replenishment parts
What it requires
- Do not award, on a sole source basis, a contract for any centrally managed replenishment part when the price of the part has increased by 25 percent or more over the most recent 12-month period
- Before computing the percentage difference between the current price and the prior price, adjust for quantity, escalation, and other factors necessary to achieve comparability
- If awarding despite the limitation, certify in writing to the head of the contracting activity before award that the price increase is fair and reasonable or that national security interests require purchase
- Obtain a fair and reasonable price even if the price has not exceeded the limitation
Key terms: centrally managed replenishment part · sole source basis · simplified acquisition threshold · head of the contracting activity · fair and reasonable price
Written by AI from this section's text. A guide, not legal advice: the text below rules.
The text
This section provides implementing guidance for section 1215 of Public Law 98-94 (10 U.S.C. 2452 note).
(a) The contracting officer shall not award, on a sole source basis, a contract for any centrally managed replenishment part when the price of the part has increased by 25 percent or more over the most recent 12-month period.
(1) Before computing the percentage difference between the current price and the prior price, adjust for quantity, escalation, and other factors necessary to achieve comparability.
(2) Departments and agencies may specify an alternate percentage or percentages for contracts at or below the simplified acquisition threshold.
(b) The contracting officer may award a contract for a part, the price of which exceeds the limitation in paragraph (a) of this section, if the contracting officer certifies in writing to the head of the contracting activity before award that—
(1) The contracting officer has evaluated the price of the part and concluded that the price increase is fair and reasonable; or
(2) The national security interests of the United States require purchase of the part despite the price increase.
(c) The fact that a particular price has not exceeded the limitation in paragraph (a) of this section does not relieve the contracting officer of the responsibility for obtaining a fair and reasonable price.
(d) Contracting officers may include a provision in sole source solicitations requiring that the offeror supply with its proposal, price and quantity data on any government orders for the replenishment part issued within the most recent 12 months.
Sections that refer to it
- 217.7502 General.
← 217.7504 Acquisition of parts when data is not available. · 217.7506 Spare parts breakout program. →
Rule changes for DFARS Part 217
- Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Mitigating Risks Related to Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (DFARS Case 2021-D011) ↗ · proposed 2026-05-07 · comments due 2026-07-06
- Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Assessing Contractor Implementation of Cybersecurity Requirements (DFARS Case 2019-D041) ↗ · final rule 2025-09-10 · effective 2025-11-10
- Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Inflation Adjustment of Acquisition-Related Thresholds (DFARS Case 2024-D002) ↗ · final rule 2025-08-25 · effective 2025-10-01
- Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Inflation Adjustment of Acquisition-Related Thresholds (DFARS Case 2024-D002) ↗ · proposed 2025-01-17 · comments due 2025-03-18
- Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Technical Amendments ↗ · final rule 2025-01-17 · effective 2025-01-17
- Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Disclosure of Information Regarding Foreign Obligations (DFARS Case 2018-D064) ↗ · proposed 2024-11-15 · comments due 2025-01-14
- Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Data Universal Numbering System to Unique Entity Identifier Transition (DFARS Case 2022-D023) ↗ · final rule 2024-09-26 · effective 2024-10-01
- Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Assessing Contractor Implementation of Cybersecurity Requirements (DFARS Case 2019-D041) ↗ · proposed 2024-08-15 · comments due 2024-10-15
Source: eCFR, 48 CFR chapters 1 and 2 (GPO GovInfo bulk data) ↗. Plain words for the terms: glossary.