FAR and DFARS › FAR Part 37: Service Contracting › Subpart 37.2
FAR 37.203 Policy.
The codified text (eCFR, as of 2026-10-02). Under the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul ↗, agencies follow class deviations with new text for many parts while the formal rules go through the Federal Register: check the solicitation and your contract's clauses, which rule.
In plain English
FAR 37.203 states that acquiring advisory and assistance services is a legitimate way to improve Government operations, and it lists specific purposes for which agencies may contract for such services. It also prohibits using these services for certain functions, such as policy-making or bypassing personnel rules, and restricts payment for proposal evaluations unless specific conditions are met.
Applies to: Agencies contracting for advisory and assistance services
Key terms: advisory and assistance services · proposal evaluation · Federally-Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC)
Written by AI from this section's text. A guide, not legal advice: the text below rules.
The text
(a) The acquisition of advisory and assistance services is a legitimate way to improve Government services and operations. Accordingly, advisory and assistance services may be used at all organizational levels to help managers achieve maximum effectiveness or economy in their operations.
(b) Subject to 37.205, agencies may contract for advisory and assistance services, when essential to the agency's mission, to—
(1) Obtain outside points of view to avoid too limited judgment on critical issues;
(2) Obtain advice regarding developments in industry, university, or foundation research;
(3) Obtain the opinions, special knowledge, or skills of noted experts;
(4) Enhance the understanding of, and develop alternative solutions to, complex issues;
(5) Support and improve the operation of organizations; or
(6) Ensure the more efficient or effective operation of managerial or hardware systems.
(c) Advisory and assistance services shall not be—
(1) Used in performing work of a policy, decision-making, or managerial nature which is the direct responsibility of agency officials;
(2) Used to bypass or undermine personnel ceilings, pay limitations, or competitive employment procedures;
(3) Contracted for on a preferential basis to former Government employees;
(4) Used under any circumstances specifically to aid in influencing or enacting legislation; or
(5) Used to obtain professional or technical advice which is readily available within the agency or another Federal agency.
(d) Limitation on payment for advisory and assistance services. Contractors may not be paid for services to conduct evaluations or analyses of any aspect of a proposal submitted for an initial contract award unless—
(1) Neither covered personnel from the requesting agency, nor from another agency, with adequate training and capabilities to perform the required proposal evaluation, are readily available and a written determination is made in accordance with 37.204;
(2) The contractor is a Federally-Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) as authorized in 41 U.S.C. 1709(c) and the work placed under the FFRDC's contract meets the criteria of 35.017-3; or
(3) Such functions are otherwise authorized by law.
Sections it refers to
← 37.202 Exclusions. · 37.204 Guidelines for determining availability of personnel. →
Rule changes for FAR Part 37
- Federal Acquisition Regulation: Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulation Overhaul Parts 6, 7, 10, 18, 26, 37, and 41 ↗ · proposed 2026-06-23 · comments due 2026-07-23
- Federal Acquisition Regulation: Preventing Organizational Conflicts of Interest in Federal Acquisition ↗ · proposed 2025-01-15 · comments due 2025-03-17
- Federal Acquisition Regulation: Sustainable Procurement ↗ · final rule 2024-04-22 · effective 2024-05-22
Source: eCFR, 48 CFR chapters 1 and 2 (GPO GovInfo bulk data) ↗. Plain words for the terms: glossary.