FAR and DFARS › FAR Part 36: Construction and Architect-engineer Contracts › Subpart 36.6

FAR 36.602-1 Selection criteria.

The codified text (eCFR, as of 2026-10-02). Under the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul ↗, agencies follow class deviations with new text for many parts while the formal rules go through the Federal Register: check the solicitation and your contract's clauses, which rule.

In plain English

This section lists the criteria agencies must use to evaluate potential contractors for architect-engineer services, covering qualifications, experience, capacity, past performance, location, and other factors. It also allows agencies to use a design competition, evaluating firms on conceptual designs, in limited situations. Knowing these criteria helps a contractor understand what the agency will look at when selecting firms.

Applies to: Agencies evaluating potential contractors for architect-engineer services

What it requires

  • Agencies shall evaluate each potential contractor using the listed criteria.

Key terms: Professional qualifications · Specialized experience · Technical competence · Capacity · Past performance

Written by AI from this section's text. A guide, not legal advice: the text below rules.

The text

(a) Agencies shall evaluate each potential contractor in terms of its—

(1) Professional qualifications necessary for satisfactory performance of required services;

(2) Specialized experience and technical competence in the type of work required, including, where appropriate, experience in energy conservation, pollution prevention, waste reduction, and the use of recovered materials;

(3) Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time;

(4) Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules;

(5) Location in the general geographical area of the project and knowledge of the locality of the project; provided, that application of this criterion leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the project; and

(6) Acceptability under other appropriate evaluation criteria.

(b) When the use of design competition is approved by the agency head or a designee, agencies may evaluate firms on the basis of their conceptual design of the project. Design competition may be used when—

(1) Unique situations exist involving prestige projects, such as the design of memorials and structures of unusual national significance;

(2) Sufficient time is available for the production and evaluation of conceptual designs; and

(3) The design competition, with its costs, will substantially benefit the project.

Sections that refer to it

← 36.602 Selection of firms for architect-engineer contracts. · 36.602-2 Evaluation boards. →

Rule changes for FAR Part 36

Source: eCFR, 48 CFR chapters 1 and 2 (GPO GovInfo bulk data) ↗. Plain words for the terms: glossary.

FAR 36.602-1 Selection criteria · SpendQuery