FAR and DFARS › FAR Part 36: Construction and Architect-engineer Contracts › Subpart 36.6
FAR 36.602-3 Evaluation board functions.
The codified text (eCFR, as of 2026-10-02). Under the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul ↗, agencies follow class deviations with new text for many parts while the formal rules go through the Federal Register: check the solicitation and your contract's clauses, which rule.
In plain English
This section describes what an evaluation board must do when selecting firms for architect-engineer services. It matters to contractors because the board reviews firm data, evaluates qualifications, holds discussions with top firms, and recommends at least three firms in order of preference.
Applies to: Evaluation boards for architect-engineer contracts
What it requires
- Review current data files on eligible firms and responses to public notice
- Evaluate firms using the criteria in 36.602-1
- Hold discussions with at least three of the most highly qualified firms
- Prepare a selection report recommending at least three firms in order of preference
Key terms: evaluation board · eligible firms · public notice · selection report · selection authority
Written by AI from this section's text. A guide, not legal advice: the text below rules.
The text
Under the general direction of the head of the contracting activity, an evaluation board shall perform the following functions:
(a) Review the current data files on eligible firms and responses to a public notice concerning the particular project (see 36.603).
(b) Evaluate the firms in accordance with the criteria in 36.602-1.
(c) Hold discussions with at least three of the most highly qualified firms regarding concepts and the relative utility of alternative methods of furnishing the required services.
(d) Prepare a selection report for the agency head or other designated selection authority recommending, in order of preference, at least three firms that are considered to be the most highly qualified to perform the required services. The report shall include a description of the discussions and evaluation conducted by the board to allow the selection authority to review the considerations upon which the recommendations are based.
Sections it refers to
Sections that refer to it
- 36.602-5 Short selection process for contracts not to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.
← 36.602-2 Evaluation boards. · 36.602-4 Selection authority. →
Rule changes for FAR Part 36
- Federal Acquisition Regulation: Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulation Overhaul Parts 14, 28, 36, and 52 ↗ · proposed 2026-09-18 · comments due 2026-10-19
- Federal Acquisition Regulation: Inflation Adjustment of Acquisition-Related Thresholds ↗ · final rule 2025-08-27 · effective 2025-10-01
- Federal Acquisition Regulation; Technical Amendments ↗ · final rule 2024-12-16 · effective 2025-01-03
- Federal Acquisition Regulation: Inflation Adjustment of Acquisition-Related Thresholds ↗ · proposed 2024-11-29 · comments due 2025-01-28
- Federal Acquisition Regulation: Prohibition on the Use of Reverse Auctions for Complex, Specialized, or Substantial Design and Construction Services ↗ · proposed 2024-08-29 · comments due 2024-10-28
- Federal Acquisition Regulation: Sustainable Procurement ↗ · final rule 2024-04-22 · effective 2024-05-22
Source: eCFR, 48 CFR chapters 1 and 2 (GPO GovInfo bulk data) ↗. Plain words for the terms: glossary.