FAR and DFARS › FAR Part 47: Transportation › Subpart 47.3

FAR 47.304-1 General.

The codified text (eCFR, as of 2026-10-02). Under the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul ↗, agencies follow class deviations with new text for many parts while the formal rules go through the Federal Register: check the solicitation and your contract's clauses, which rule.

In plain English

This section tells contracting officers how to decide whether supplies will be bought f.o.b. origin or f.o.b. destination, based mainly on overall cost and traffic-management considerations. It also lists situations where solicitations must or normally should be limited to one basis, such as f.o.b. origin only when destinations are unknown, or f.o.b. destination only when acceptance must occur at destination. For contractors, this matters because it determines where title, risk, and transportation responsibility fall, and what kind of offer you may be allowed to submit.

Applies to: Contracting officers and offerors on solicitations involving delivery terms for supplies

What it requires

  • Contracting officers must determine f.o.b. terms generally on the basis of overall costs, considering the criteria in 47.304.
  • Solicitations must specify whether offers are f.o.b. origin, f.o.b. destination, or both, or whether offerors may choose.
  • When destinations are tentative or unknown, the solicitation must be f.o.b. origin only.
  • When acceptance must be at destination, the solicitation must be f.o.b. destination only.

Key terms: f.o.b. origin · f.o.b. destination · freight rates · transit privileges · CONUS

Written by AI from this section's text. A guide, not legal advice: the text below rules.

The text

(a) The contracting officer shall determine f.o.b. terms generally on the basis of overall costs, giving due consideration to the criteria given in 47.304.

(b) Solicitations shall specify whether offerors must submit offers f.o.b. origin, f.o.b. destination, or both; or whether offerors may choose the basis on which they make an offer. The contracting officer shall consider the most advantageous delivery point, such as (1) f.o.b. origin, carrier's equipment, wharf, or specified freight station near contractor's plant; or (2) f.o.b. destination.

(c) In determining whether f.o.b. origin or f.o.b. destination is more advantageous to the Government, the contracting officer shall consider the availability of lower freight rates (Government rate tenders) to the Government for f.o.b. origin acquisitions. F.o.b. origin contracts also present other desirable traffic management features, in that they—

(1) Permit use of transit privileges (see 47.305-13);

(2) Permit diversions to new destinations without price adjustment for transportation (see 47.305-11);

(3) Facilitate use of special routings or types of equipment (e.g., circuitous routing or oversize shipments) (see 47.305-14);

(4) Facilitate, if necessary, use of premium cost transportation and permit Government-controlled transportation;

(5) Permit negotiations for reduced freight rates (see 47.104-1(b)); and

(6) Permit use of small shipment consolidation stations.

(d) When destinations are tentative or unknown, the solicitation shall be f.o.b. origin only (see 47.305-5).

(e) When the size or quantity of supplies with confidential or higher security classification requires commercial transportation services, the contracting officer shall generally specify f.o.b. origin acquisitions.

(f) When acceptance must be at destination, solicitation shall be on an f.o.b. destination only basis.

(g) Following are examples of situations when solicitations shall normally be on an f.o.b. destination only basis because it is advantageous to the Government (see 47.305-4):

(1) Bulk supplies, such as coal, that require other than Government-owned or operated handling, storage, and loading facilities, are destined for shipment outside CONUS.

(2) Steel or other bulk construction products are destined for shipment outside CONUS.

(3) Supplies consist of forest products such as lumber.

(4) Perishable or medical supplies are subject to in-transit deterioration.

(5) Evaluation of f.o.b. origin offers is anticipated to result in increased administrative lead time or administrative cost that would outweigh the potential advantages of an f.o.b. origin determination.

Sections it refers to

Sections that refer to it

  • 47.302 Place of delivery—f.o.b. point.

← 47.304 Determination of delivery terms. · 47.304-2 Shipments within CONUS. →

Rule changes for FAR Part 47

Source: eCFR, 48 CFR chapters 1 and 2 (GPO GovInfo bulk data) ↗. Plain words for the terms: glossary.

FAR 47.304-1 General · SpendQuery