FAR and DFARS › FAR Part 6: Competition Requirements › Subpart 6.3

FAR 6.303-2 Content.

The codified text (eCFR, as of 2026-10-02). Under the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul ↗, agencies follow class deviations with new text for many parts while the formal rules go through the Federal Register: check the solicitation and your contract's clauses, which rule.

In plain English

FAR 6.303-2 specifies what must be included in a justification for using other than full and open competition. It requires detailed facts and rationale, and lists the minimum content for most justifications, with special rules for sole-source 8(a) contracts over $30 million. Contractors should understand this because it explains the documentation a contracting officer must prepare when limiting competition.

Applies to: Contracting officers preparing justifications for other than full and open competition

What it requires

  • Include sufficient facts and rationale to justify the specific authority cited.
  • Include the minimum information listed in paragraph (b) for most justifications.
  • Include evidence that supporting data from technical or requirements personnel has been certified as complete and accurate.
  • For sole-source 8(a) contracts over $30 million, include the minimum information listed in paragraph (d).

Key terms: Justification for other than full and open competition · sole-source 8(a) contract · statutory authority · market research · contracting officer certification

Written by AI from this section's text. A guide, not legal advice: the text below rules.

The text

(a) Each justification shall contain sufficient facts and rationale to justify the use of the specific authority cited.

(b) As a minimum, each justification, except those for sole-source 8(a) contracts over $30 million (see paragraph (d) of this section), shall include the following information:

(1) Identification of the agency and the contracting activity, and specific identification of the document as a “Justification for other than full and open competition.”

(2) Nature and/or description of the action being approved.

(3) A description of the supplies or services required to meet the agency's needs (including the estimated value).

(4) An identification of the statutory authority permitting other than full and open competition.

(5) A demonstration that the proposed contractor's unique qualifications or the nature of the acquisition requires use of the authority cited.

(6) A description of efforts made to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as is practicable, including whether a notice was or will be publicized as required by subpart 5.2 and, if not, which exception under 5.202 applies.

(7) A determination by the contracting officer that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable.

(8) A description of the market research conducted (see part 10) and the results or a statement of the reason market research was not conducted.

(9) Any other facts supporting the use of other than full and open competition, such as:

(i) Explanation of why technical data packages, specifications, engineering descriptions, statements of work, or purchase descriptions suitable for full and open competition have not been developed or are not available.

(ii) When 6.302-1 is cited for follow-on acquisitions as described in 6.302-1(a)(2)(ii), an estimate of the cost to the Government that would be duplicated and how the estimate was derived.

(iii) When 6.302-2 is cited, data, estimated cost, or other rationale as to the extent and nature of the harm to the Government.

(10) A listing of the sources, if any, that expressed, in writing, an interest in the acquisition.

(11) A statement of the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers to competition before any subsequent acquisition for the supplies or services required.

(12) Contracting officer certification that the justification is accurate and complete to the best of the contracting officer's knowledge and belief.

(c) Each justification shall include evidence that any supporting data that is the responsibility of technical or requirements personnel (e.g., verifying the Government's minimum needs or schedule requirements or other rationale for other than full and open competition) and which form a basis for the justification have been certified as complete and accurate by the technical or requirements personnel.

(d) As a minimum, each justification for a sole-source 8(a) contract over $30 million shall include the following information:

(1) A description of the needs of the agency concerned for the matters covered by the contract.

(2) A specification of the statutory provision providing the exception from the requirement to use competitive procedures in entering into the contract (see 19.805-1).

(3) A determination that the use of a sole-source contract is in the best interest of the agency concerned.

(4) A determination that the anticipated cost of the contract will be fair and reasonable.

(5) Such other matters as the head of the agency concerned shall specify for purposes of this section.

Sections it refers to

  • 5.202 Exceptions.
  • 6.302-1 Only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements.
  • 6.302-2 Unusual and compelling urgency.
  • 19.805-1 General.

Sections that refer to it

  • 6.303-1 Requirements.
  • 6.304 Approval of the justification.
  • 13.501 Special documentation requirements.
  • 15.607 Criteria for acceptance and negotiation of an unsolicited proposal.
  • 206.303-1 Requirements.
  • 206.303-2 Content.

← 6.303-1 Requirements. · 6.304 Approval of the justification. →

Rule changes for FAR Part 6

Source: eCFR, 48 CFR chapters 1 and 2 (GPO GovInfo bulk data) ↗. Plain words for the terms: glossary.

FAR 6.303-2 Content · SpendQuery